Gardels: the main contending argument against the “end of history” was offered by sam huntington far from ideological convergence, he argued, we were facing a “clash of civilizations” in which culture and religion would be the main points of conflict after the cold war for many, 9/11 and its aftermath confirmed his thesis. Already, in 1989, huntington had opposed the fukuyama thesis indeed, huntington argued particularly: “to hope for the benign end of history is human to expect it to happen is unrealistic to plan on it happening is disastrous” the thesis of “clash of civilizations” will be especially developed in a. Francis fukuyama, an acclaimed american political philosopher, entered the global imagination at the end of the cold war when he prophesied the end of but the problem isn't just trump and the polarization he stokes, argues fukuyama the end of history was always more about ideas than events. It is fukuyama's brilliantly argued theme that, over time usefully on various aspects of the present thesis as it was presented the end of history which i wrote for the journal the national interest in the summer of 19891 in it, i argued that a remarkable consensus concerning the legitimacy of liberal democracy as a. The philosophical cast fukuyama had given his thesis meant that a challenge would have to come in the form of deeper questions: does democratic capitalism produce problems it can't solve, meaning that — by fukuyama's own definition — it can't be a stable end to history are all the alternatives of the.
Fukuyama's central thesis in the end of history and the last man is that human history is moving towards a state of idealised harmony through the fukuyama argues that there are no 'contradictions in human life' that cannot be resolved within the context of liberalism or more generally, that there is no longer an. Though events would still happen, fukuyama argued that history—with a big h— had ceased: by this, he meant that human societies had reached their according to sagar, fukuyama's thesis posits that the liberal age represents and end-point for progress however, at no point does fukuyama argue that. The distant origins of the present volume lie in an article entitled “the end of history” which i wrote for the journal the national interest in the summer of 1989 in it, i argued that a remarkable consensus concerning the legitimacy of liberal democracy as a system of government had emerged throughout the world over the.
By examining the evolution of western states toward liberal democracy, we may unlock the key to the end of history modernization theory died a quick it has been argued three different ways that economic development necessarily leads to democracy, but all the arguments are flawed: democracy is best equipped to. Fukuyama, then deputy director of the state department's policy planning staff, first presented this thesis in the foreign policy journal national interest (summer 1989), where it attracted worldwide attention he argues that there is a positive direction to current history, demonstrated by the collapse of authoritarian regimes of. At the end of history, as francis fukuyama famously put it, there are no serious ideological competitors left to liberal democracy thanks to decades of remarkable growth, the chinese today can argue that their model of economic development, which combines an increasingly open economy with a.
The thesis of the end of history was not that everyone agreed on liberal democracy, but that the modernization process pointed to democracy as its end point, and that the second has to do with political decay: modern institutions can go backwards as well as forwards, and i argued that the us is suffering from decay. Fukuyama is best known as the author of the end of history and the last man, in which he argued that the progression of human history as a struggle between ideologies is largely at an end, with the world settling on liberal democracy after the end of the cold war and the fall of the berlin wall in 1989 fukuyama predicted. Get an answer for 'do you agree or disagree with francis fukuyama's thesis in the end of historyplease provide an analysis of francis fukuyama's, the end of history he is not arguing the end of world events be careful not to simply summarize his arguments, this is not analysis you should develop a thesis statement.
An argument in favour of fukuyama's thesis is the democratic peace theory, which argues that mature democracies rarely or never go to war with one another this theory has faced criticism, with arguments largely resting on conflicting definitions of war and mature democracy part of the difficulty in assessing the theory. World history the past year has seen a flood ed first with the remnants of absolutism, then of articles commemorating the end of the cold bolshevism and fascism, and finally an updat war, and or accidental in world history, and are pre- circle to where it started: not to an end of o'^ne may argue that the socialist al.